This is the next big grab for Hollywood - these videos are DRMed, but that isn't enough for Sony. They now want to be able to dictate the specific hardware that you will be allowed to watch your movies on. I predict the next step will be an announcement that Columbia pictures Blu-Ray discs will only play in Sony-branded players. That is really no more ridiculous than this is.

Lush - Of course, I would not kick Miki Berenyi out of bed, regardless of the number of crackers she might eat, but it's actually Emma that I fall asleep thinking of:

For Love
Lady Killers - Turns out that Anthony from the RHCPs is a dick - No one could have predicted this
Hypocrite
Single Girl
Shake Baby Shake
Sweetness and Light

My Bloody Valentine (probably the greatest band ever - only by the album Loveless though - the rest are crap ):
Only Shallow
Soon

And, of course, The Pulp. JARVIS!!!!:
Common People
Disco 2000
Something Changed

And not really shoe gaze, but I love "the Divine Comedy" too much to abandon them:
The National Express
Becoming More like Alfie
Gin Soaked Boy
I've Been To A Marvelous Party

They have essentially undermined the institution of marriage completely. As of now it is clear that the State can unilaterally, without the consent of the couple in question, dissolve a legal marriage. Some of these same-sex marraiges were conscecrated in in churches. Prop 8 has made it clear that the State can void a church's rites and rituals as it sees fit.

So, while they were pretending to be worried that the State would force them to perform gay marriages (which was never even on the table) instead they have changed "'Til Death do us part" to "So long as 51% of the electorate continues to believe that we should be allowed to remain married".

Great job there, dumbasses. Way to protect the instituion of marriage.

If it wasn't for you meddling kids!

Let's hear it for high youth voter turn out!

UPDATE: Actually, that guy that gave McCain's concession speech was pretty good - if only he had run...he might have had a chance!

Really though...vote against John McCain. I have this great picture I made that I want to post, but it's only funny if he loses. Really, have you got anything better to base you vote on? I didn't think so. (Young voters are ESPECIALLY encouraged. Really, it's extra funny then)

I went down and cast my vote early today. Because it's too late for it to matter to me, I fully expect that Barack Obama will now reveal that he is a secret Muslim terrorist. If he doesn't, I will feel like I threw my vote away. Death to America!

If [the media] convince enough voters that that is negative campaigning, for me to call Barack Obama out on his associations," Palin said, "then I don't know what the future of our country would be in terms of First Amendment rights and our ability to ask questions without fear of attacks by the mainstream media.

Since I know she has never read the first amendment I will reprint it here for her:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Dear stupid person running for V.P. - The first amendment says the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT can't restrict your speech. When the media call you out on being an ass that is actually an EXERCISE of first amendment rights! It's actually WHAT THE RIGHT IS ALL ABOUT!

UPDATE: I have just been reminded that she has a degree in Journalism - which she apparently got without understanding a single thing about journalism! I am not saying that I have proof that she slept with her professors, but it would be irresponsible for me not to speculate about it.

* Some people think it is mean to say that Sarah Palin is a dummy with no clue what she is talking about. I actually think that assuming she is simply ignorant and not smart enough to learn anything is a compliment - the other option is that she is intentionally lying about things and is a venal, evil person without scruples that would say anything to further her career. Since that would be a mean thing to think of anyone I instead prefer to think that she is not too bright and doesn't understand this stuff.

- Sarah Palin speaking to Phillip Gourevitch of the New Yorker

The funny thing is, I really don't think she even knows enough about political and economic science to understand how stupid she is.

Duffy - the real one, not that chick

Switchblades

The Rainy Season. I think that "and you're like a mirage I could learn to hate" is maybe the best line ever.

Bongos, numbers & etc.

Maybe the best song ever

Except that this song is completely, totally, and with out dispute the finest piece of music evers - fuck all you "How Soon is Now" losers.And now...

Let's see...an ass load of Propaganda the best band you don't already worship. Duel, "P-Machinery", Dr. Mabuse (Yes, I have seen all the movies), God, I love Claudia Brücken. Really, It's sad.

I seem to remember briefly being friends with these guys.

And, of course, the greatest band ever. Really...they got a lot better. Mom, Dad, this is what I was going for. Honest...I liked girls.

The idea is that instead of buying up a lot of toxic debt that cannot be realistically priced, the government will instead invest money into the banks themselves (and hey, probably other things eventually, like car manufacturers - just wait!). In return the government will get preferred stock, either with a promised return (like, say, Warren Buffet), or at least with priority in dividends over regular investors. This might seem unfair, but keep in mind that the other option is that the bank goes under and the investors lose everything...so a pretty good deal over all. This will provide the financial system with additional capital...and the calm and reassurance that comes with that. Hopefully the credit markets improve, and this will fix the commercial paper problems that are causing us to teeter on the precipice of doom. Also, if we are shareholders then we can call for the executives and the boards that got us into the position to be fired and their ridiculous golden parachutes (or Suckage Insurance) rescinded. Appropriate to their business acumen there people can then be offered positions as shift Managers at WalMarts across the country.

Once disaster is averted, and the banks are better capitalized, they can start to address the issue of how to fix the toxic mortgage problem. They will hate doing this since it's mostly going to involve re-writing adjustable mortgages to thirty year fixed at around 6-8% fixed apr. Reasonable, but not great for both sides, but good enough that it could keep some people in their homes. In some cases where homes are underwater banks are going to have to bite the bullet, realize how much they would lose in a foreclosure, and do what so many small business owners do when they have shelves filled with crappy product that is not moving - mark it down to reflect the the new, lower, values. They will lose pretend money, but less than they would if they foreclosed and sold at auction, probably, with all the attendant costs.

Individual home owners who took out equity 3 times the value of their house will have their Lexus cars, Big Screen TVs and other luxury items bought on credit repossessed, and they will be placed into stocks in front of their homes with signs around their necks showing the amount of actual money they put into their homes ($9000) and the amount of equity they borrowed against them ($450,000). Clanking below the stocks will be metal buckets into which passersby may place coins. Once the homeowners have collected enough coins to cover the principle (after all, we are not monsters) on their home equity loans their first mortgages will be written down to the market value and refinance as fixed rate loans. For the years they have spent in the stocks they will get a $1000 credit to use at the Salvation Army or Goodwill to refurnish their homes.

This is a good thing. This (if you ignore the snark above) is the most orderly way to approach this problem, short of having a time machine to go back and put proper regulations in place 10 years ago.

This problem is the result of a lot of things (oddly, not of any of the things John McCain talks about), and it was encouraged by deregulation from both the Republican and Democratic wings of our single party system (you do realize that we have a one party system in America, where we choose between the middle right and the far right wings of the party, while everything in the party's left of middle get's ignored, right? That's another blog post though). The only way to fix it is sensible regulation.

People don't seem to remember that markets needs rules in order to thrive. Not stupid rules though. Since I am in trucking I will use an example from there - the old (70s) trucking regulations that required everyone to charge the same for the same freight going the same distance. This is a stupid regulation that (obviously) stifles competition. The has been rescinded now, and the newer regulations have to do with safety - the maximum hours and breaks for a long haul driver, for example. This is something that makes some degree of sense, since it's regulating an area of the market that the public has an over riding interest in - the safety of the trucks on the road. Trucks also have to obey the laws of the road - speed limits, stop signs and obey maximum weight limits on some roads and clearly label dangerous cargo.

This is exactly the same kind of regulation that markets need. Keep in mind that the market is, in many ways, an artificial construct, just like a game and a game without rules is a game that no one in their right mind should want to play.

I am actually hoping that this crisis will end up being a good thing, resulting more stable markets that bubble less often and don't pop as disastrously. Maybe Milton Friedman can finally be placed up on the shelf with equally discredited economic theorists like...oh...say...Marx (really - watch Duck Soup again). We are all Keynesians and Social Democrats now.

Also, I am betting on Dow 6000 before the election. Who want's to take over/under? I'm also betting on about a 3 year recovery, with severe short term contraction and steady, but slow growth starting from there and bringing us back to near where we are today, but with much more regulated and stable markets. Assuming Obama wins. If McCain wins we will be fighting with dogs over dead rats in the street with a year, and descending into cannibalism by mid-2010. And since no one will have electricity FOX will not even be able to make a reality show out of it.

Italicized items are satirical and not intended to be taken too seriously. Note the bit about McCain leading directly to cannibalism is NOT Italicized.

And you may ask yourself, "My God, what have I done?"

Also, how many towns still have a discernable mainstreet? What percentage of the population live there? Do these mainstreets continue to thrive in the face of big box stores and exert a great influence on our cultural debate?

Joe came off okay, but really, "Bosniacs"?

Update: I stand corrected. Apparently "Bosniak" has been the correct term for Bosnian Muslims since the late 1990s. I guess that mean's Joe wins on foreign policy. You know, in a debate against me. Of course, someone who is Veeping for a secret Muslim would know that sort of thing.

Millions, billions and trillions all sound the same. But a million seconds takes about 11 days to expire; because a billion is a thousand million, a billion seconds takes about 30 years to expire; because a trillion is a thousand billion, a trillion seconds takes about 30,000 years to expire. These are not interchangeable orders of magnitude, folks.

On the other hand, the bailout will only cost you personally a dollar a second for the next 33 minutes!

What will the failure of the bill to pass mean? Good question. It could mean that credit will freeze up, the Dow will fall and financial companies will have to admit that many of their assets are, in fact, completely worthless and write them down. This would be accompanied by a HUGE market adjustment downwards.

I suppose it's also possible that congress might stay in session and try to come up with another compromise before they go off to campaign (on what exactly I am not sure).

At this point I am not sure that I care which it is. The former is going to have to happen eventualy to really resolve this problem. Everything else is just gaming to put it off a little longer, or to shift where the hot potato is when it goes off. Maybe financial disaster is the best solution to resolving this quickly and finally.