> Shouldn't the rule simply be "If you are on the ballot, you are in the debate"?
> You know, assuming you haven't dropped out of the race officially.

No, because then it would be too difficult for me to manipulate your elections!

...Not that it's going that great for me this time around. The best I could do was keep guys like Chris Dodd from getting any media oxygen. That guy would have been a total nightmare. Totally. Unashamed. Noncloset. Liberal.

The material I've got to work with this time just sucks. I've pretty much resigned to myself to the fact that Rudy screwed-the-pooch and is basically droppped-out-man-walking. Huck scares the crap out of most pin-striped boardroom conservatives like myself. Though not as scary as Huck, Romney is your basic nightmare: A liberal New England Republican.

Shame we couldn't implant Dick Cheney's mind into the body of a 45 year old man. I keep telling Condi "It's not too late to be a spoiler..." but she's tired of DC and the spotlight and wants to make some private $ector benjamins. That and she wants to find another "pianist" to play duets with(you can read between the lines on that one).

Obama keeps using the c-word("change") but in the process of getting elected he's going to owe some serious fealty for those big checks. Hillary I can do business with(as long as my readers never know about it) and with her help we'll move turn a lot of high-definition bile into a ton of low-def cash.

So enjoy this 'liberal backlash' election while it lasts, because inflation, falling dollar, recession, $100+ barrels of oil, and housing prices are going to make a lot of bitter, angry americans. Before you know it CNN and the NY POST will have Americans screaming for war in Iran, a big-ass mexican fence, and

'Rupe

And? And what? "And then I will at last be able to put "Page 3 Girls" into the Wall Street Journal while my Fox News Network simultaneously and incorrectly decries the pornographic content of the video game Mass Effect"?

And What?!?